How does a spoiler, which provides detailed information about a movie, spoil your enjoyment of the movie, given that information about the movie helps people choose movies? Contrary to the common sense view that spoilers interfere with movie enjoyment, there are arguments to the contrary. I shall examine these arguments and focus the one that is related to what is called the paradox of suspense. This paradox is based on the observation that some people watch suspenseful films multiple times. If spoilers do ruin enjoying movies, the existence of repeaters is hard to explain. If we cannot deny that there are repeaters, it seems that we should accept that spoilers do not actually ruin our enjoyment. To resolve the paradox Smuts and Carroll reject one proposition that constitutes the suspense paradox, namely, the proposition that suspense requires uncertainty. On the other hand Gerrig tries to reject another proposition that repeaters know the outcomes of the movies with certainty. I argue that Smuts, Carroll and Gerrig’s account do not adequately explain the phenomenon of people avoiding spoilers. There is one promising way of resolving the paradox left which also explains the phenomenon. It is to deny the proposition that repeaters expereince suspense every time they watch the same suspense movie. Finally, I shall claim that spoilers ruin the enjoyment of watching movies because spoilers reveal the identity of the narrative structure of a movie not in the way that the movie creators intend.