Since 17-18 C the camera obscura has been played a role of symbolizing the new order of the vision and the pornography is the negativist example of it. The camera obscura as form suggested not only the optical, technical issues but also the political and economic insights in the human science and has constructed so called the épistémè of the modernity. In the vision, the concept of the observer has changed as the relations of signifiants have been focused and the real has been forgotten behind it. It can be found in the fine art's Perspectives, the philosophy of Descartes, the human right of the liberal democracy, the semiology of Saussure, and the surrealist arts. In our normal vision we can experience the paradox of the regard due to the distance between eyes and the regard, where the other is being. 'When I think I regard it, I find it stares at me.' But in pornography this distance is erased and the spectator of porno just seas what he wants to sea. As the difference between the ego and the other has been disappeared, he may become pervert or become paranoiac ,who makes his desires be real directly without any midium. The mirror is the optical apparatus to show this paranoiac form of the ego, Lacan described the violent act of the child due to the isolation after the ego's narcissist identification with the mirror image. Throughout this perspective I want to support the Dworkin's radical views toward the anti-pornography newly, find the effective critical point to deconstruct and rethink 'the freedom of the expression' which has obstructed the eradication of the porno so far. So I try to hold out against the capitalist strategy of non-subjectification in pornography.