This Thesis is to evaluates whether or not Zhuangzi's epistemology is relativistic. Zhuangzi recognized that cognition is relativistic and for this he criticized the exclusive and dogmatic attitude that relativistic cognition may take. Cognitive relativism implies the inability to establish cognitive objectivity or generality on an object due to the changes in the object, cognition's subjectivity, as well as the limits on the ideas of language. Even though an object ceases to remain constant and constantly alters itself, subjectivity and linguistic concepts assumes objects to remain constant and are unable to view the object as an independent and individual entity. Once the subject's cognition is in discord with the object itself, truthfulness becomes questionable and relativistic cognition mutates to skepticism. Zhuangzi's epistemology understands both relativism and skepticism in an experiential dimension of everyday events. However, Zhuangzi's lenient cognitive-relativism establishes generality within everyday events from the perspective of Tao and in addition to this universality of Tao it understands the detailed and specialized relativism of a figurative object. Hence, Zhuangzi ultimately embraces the possibility of establishing objective cognition through great wisdom(大知) and real knowledge(眞知).