This paper can begin by asking the following question. What a moral responsibilities do we as individuals have toward potential and actual world famine victims? And what duties do the wealthy countries have to the poor and hungry of the world? What duties do individuals have to help? That is, Do we have a moral obligation to eliminate starvation and malnutrition among the needy? These problems are not an academic problem but one that stares us in the face through the eyes of starving and malnourished people, in particular, children. Therefore, the very fact of widespread hunger imposes a duty on each person to do whatever he or she is capable of doing to accomplish whatever is necessary to see to it that all people have enough to eat. According to Robert N. Van Wyk's deontological perspective, we have moral obligations to provide aid to those countries for whose poverty and hunger we are at least partly responsible. We have these obligations because morality requires us to compensate others for the harms we do them. And according to Van Wyk, if we fail to relieve others' distress by providing them with the necessities of life, our actions are inconsistent with treating them as having any value as ends in themselves. And then, Van Wyk maintain that we have perfect duty to give 'at least a fair share' toward seeing that all human beings are treated as ends in themselves. Van Wyk's this approach is based on the ethical system developed by Immanuel Kant. Therefore, if Van Wyk is correct, then we have moral obligations to at least some disadvantaged countries and the people.