In this article, I explore and evaluates the economic implications of neo- republicanism. In other to assess the main features of a neo-republican civic economy, it is necessary to explain the main features on republicanism as a whole. The Athenian schools of republicanism stressing the importance of public-spired political participation and the Roman schools of republicanism stressing the value of independence or freedom under law. The cornerstones of republicanism are political equality, self-government and civic virtue. The neo-republicanism reject the market as a general model of worthy social intercourse and doubt that the market will work toward the accomplishment of political equality, freedom as self-government, civic virtue. With regard to market, their options are to abolish markets, to look for ways to limit the political effects of wealth, or to limit the disparities in wealth that flow from markets. They cannot the first option because they attach instrumental values to market within the proper sphere. But they can pursue the second and the third possibilities to achieve political equality. But I argue that the neo- republican civic economy is not successful.