Can an atomic individual organize a community in the postmodern city? The answer to this question can be found in the commons of the premodern era. Commoners in the premodern era were able to self-support and self-govern in the (rural) communities that mediate the commons. In this context, postmodern individuals can compose autonomous communities if they can find the common in the city. Modern capital and states own the means of production privately and publicly. The capitalists in a capitalist society completely control and possess the labor force and the means of production through mechanization and systemization. In parallel with this, the autonomy of the community was transformed into the state government. In this reality, atomic individuals are the names given in return for the loss of subsistence and autonomy of the commons. The atomic individual means that the means of production of the capitalist replaces the commons and the national representative system is a substitute for the autonomy of the community. Now atomic individuals can have freedom and equality only heteronomously and perfunctorily. Thus, the modern city became a place of hierarchy and exploitation by states and capital. However, the multitude in the postmodern city can newly organize the common as an immaterial product which is an alternative to public and private ownership. The multitude produces the common as an immaterial product through mutual communication, cooperation, and autonomy in the economic sphere. “Both producers and products” became “subjects” in the postmodern immaterial production. In addition, postmodern cities are interconnected with and infiltrated into the immaterial common. Therefore, the multitude will realize the common and an absolute democracy which newly composes the institutions and constitution by every generation in parallel with economic self-sufficiency in urban communities that mediate the common.